Housing minister Grant Shapps has ruled out statutory regulation of the leasehold sector, but may well introduce measures to improve Leasehold Valuation Tribunals.
Furthermore, an announcement on the fraught issue of “exit fees” in the leasehold retirement sector, which are payable when a flat is sold, can be expected soon. These have been the subject of a prolonged inquiry by the Office of Fair Trading, which is due to make an announcement on the issue in mid-August.
Shapps says of leasehold: “I am therefore thinking about the issue and have not ruled out making other changes where I am able.”
His views are expressed in a letter to Kenneth Clark, the Justice Secretary, who raised the issue on behalf of a pensioner in his Nottingham constituency. The exchange of letters took place last month.
They are the clearest indication of the current thinking of the Housing Minister on leasehold issues.
“I recognise that where problems arise over leaseholders’ homes, especially about the actions of managing agents, these can cause real inconvenience and, in some cases, distress. I appreciate that this is particularly true where elderly leaseholders are living in retirement leasehold developments. Disputes can arise from the nature of leasehold tenure, where both landlord and leaseholder have different, and sometimes conflicting, interests in the same property. The law therefore provides leaseholders with a wide range of rights to avoid these disputes or, where they arise, to enable them to be resolved.
“Overall, I believe that improvements should be driven by a more proactive approach from professionals in the leasehold sector, not by greater regulation, and expect landlords and managing agents to obey the law and act in a socially-responsible manner.
“Some leaseholders may however, find it stressful and burdensome to take a case against their landlord to a court or even a less formal Leasehold Valuation Tribunal. It may therefore be that the current processes could work more effectively or that leaseholders could receive more help in exercising their rights. I am therefore thinking about the issue and have not ruled out making other changes where I am able.
“The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is responsible for the Office of Fair Trading and its investigations into “exit fees”. As Housing Minister, however, I have received numerous representations about this issue, and have a keen interest in the outcome which will soon, I hope, be reaching its conclusions. Depending on the outcome, I have not ruled out taking further steps to address this issue should it prove necessary.”
Related posts:
Grant Shapps cuts Wikipedia references to property tycoons’ donations to his private office
Lonely Shapps: the only one who doesn’t think there is a need for leasehold regulation
Oh, and why does Shapps want to regulate park homes and not leasehold, even though the issues are so similar?
Government to ‘take forward’ CMA leasehold report, but rejects making right to manage easier
Any idea why this lot paid for Grant Shapps’ office?
He simply just does not have a clue! Reform was there on the table from the last government – a government that in most respects, acted for the people not for business. As someone unfortunate to live in a leasehold property, I have disputes that the leasehold tribunal service won’t and can’t deal with as it is not related to service charge but the standard and ethics of the leasehold company. It can act in the manner it does aware that this Tory government is working for them and not for the 1.6m leaseholders who Grant Shapps knows do not live in middle class England as most apartments and flats are situated in cities so does not have to fear votes lost. But then again … this government wasn’t voted in!